Oxides and nitrides as alternative plasmonic materials in the optical range [Invited]

As alternatives to conventional metals, new plasmonic materials offer many advantages in the rapidly growing fields of plasmonics and metamaterials. These advantages include low intrinsic loss, semiconductor-based design, compatibility with standard nanofabrication processes, tunability, and others. Transparent conducting oxides such as Al:ZnO, Ga:ZnO and indium-tin-oxide (ITO) enable many high-performance metamaterial devices operating in the near-IR. Transition-metal nitrides such as TiN or ZrN can be substitutes for conventional metals in the visible frequencies. In this paper we provide the details of fabrication and characterization of these new materials and discuss their suitability for a number of metamaterial and plasmonic applications. © 2011 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (160.3918) Metamaterials; (160.4236) Nanomaterials; (250.5403) Plasmonics; (310.6860) Thin films, optical properties. References and links 1. A. Boltasseva and H. Atwater, “Low-loss plasmonic metamaterials,” Science 331, 290–291 (2011). 2. S. Kehr, Y. Liu, L. Martin, P. Yu, M. Gajek, S. Yang, C. Yang, M. Wenzel, R. Jacob, H. von Ribbeck, M. Helm, X. Zhang, L. Eng, and R. Ramesh, “Near-field examination of perovskite-based superlenses and superlensenhanced probe-object coupling,” Nat. Commun. 2, 249–249 (2011). 3. J. Luther, P. Jain, T. Ewers, and A. Alivisatos, “Localized surface plasmon resonances arising from free carriers in doped quantum dots,” Nat. Mater. 10, 361–366 (2011). 4. D. Slocum, S. Inampudi, D. Adams, S. Vangala, N. Kuhta, W. Goodhue, V. Podolskiy, and D. Wasserman, “Funneling light through a subwavelength aperture with epsilon-near-zero materials,” Arxiv preprint arXiv:1103.6013 (2011). 5. E. Feigenbaum, K. Diest, and H. Atwater, “Unity-order index change in transparent conducting oxides at visible frequencies,” Nano Lett. 10, 2111–2116 (2010). 6. D.-G. Park, T.-H. Cha, K.-Y. Lim, H.-J. Cho, T.-K. Kim, S.-A. Jang, Y.-S. Suh, V. Misra, I.-S. Yeo, J.-S. Roh, J. W. Park, and H.-K. Yoon, “Robust ternary metal gate electrodes for dual gate CMOS devices,” in “Electron Devices Meeting, 2001. IEDM Technical Digest. International,” (IEEE, 2001), pp. 30.6.1–30.6.4. 7. P. West, S. Ishii, G. Naik, N. Emani, V. Shalaev, and A. Boltasseva, “Searching for better plasmonic materials,” Laser Photon. Rev. 4, 795–808 (2010). 8. D. Bobb, G. Zhu, M. Mayy, A. Gavrilenko, P. Mead, V. Gavrilenko, and M. Noginov, “Engineering of low-loss metal for nanoplasmonic and metamaterials applications,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 151102 (2009). 9. G. Naik and A. Boltasseva, “Ceramic plasmonic components for optical metamaterials,” in “Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference” (Optical Society of America, 2011). #151151 $15.00 USD Received 15 Jul 2011; revised 29 Aug 2011; accepted 30 Aug 2011; published 6 Sep 2011 (C) 2011 OSA 1 October 2011 / Vol. 1, No. 6 / OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS 1090 10. G. Zhu, L. Gu, J. Kitur, A. Urbas, J. Vella, and M. Noginov, “Organic materials with negative and controllable electric permittivity,” in “Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference” (Optical Society of America, 2011). 11. G. V. Naik and A. Boltasseva, “Semiconductors for plasmonics and metamaterials,” Phys. Status Solidi (RRL) 4, 295–297 (2010). 12. N. Ashcroft and N. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Saunders College, 1976). 13. M. Yoon, S. Lee, H. Park, H. Kim, and M. Jang, “Solid solubility limits of Ga and Al in ZnO,” J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 21, 1703–1704 (2002). 14. K. Tominaga, H. Manabe, N. Umezu, I. Mori, T. Ushiro, and I. Nakabayashi, “Film properties of ZnO: Al prepared by cosputtering of ZnO:Al and either Zn or Al targets,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15, 1074–1079 (1997). 15. K. Ellmer and R. Mientus, “Carrier transport in polycrystalline ITO and ZnO:Al II: the influence of grain barriers and boundaries,” Thin Solid Films 516, 5829–5835 (2008). 16. D. Horwat, M. Jullien, F. Capon, J. Pierson, J. Andersson, and J. Endrino, “On the deactivation of the dopant and electronic structure in reactively sputtered transparent Al-doped ZnO thin films,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 132003 (2010). 17. K. Kim, K. Park, and D. Ma, “Structural, electrical and optical properties of aluminum doped zinc oxide films prepared by radio frequency magnetron sputtering,” J. Appl. Phys. 81, 7764–7772 (1997). 18. D. Kim, M. Park, H. Lee, and G. Lee, “Thickness dependence of electrical properties of ITO film deposited on a plastic substrate by RF magnetron sputtering,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 253, 409–411 (2006). 19. A. Suzuki, M. Nakamura, R. Michihata, T. Aoki, T. Matsushita, and M. Okuda, “Ultrathin Al-doped transparent conducting zinc oxide films fabricated by pulsed laser deposition,” Thin Solid Films 517, 1478–1481 (2008). 20. M. Lee, J. Lim, J. Bang, W. Lee, and J. Myoung, “Effect of the thickness and hydrogen treatment on the properties of Ga-doped ZnO transparent conductive films,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 3195–3200 (2008). 21. T. Minami, T. Miyata, Y. Ohtani, and T. Kuboi, “Effect of thickness on the stability of transparent conducting impurity-doped ZnO thin films in a high humidity environment,” Phys. Status Solidi (RRL) 1, R31–R33 (2007). 22. B. Karlsson, R. Shimshock, B. Seraphin, and J. Haygarth, “Optical properties of CVD-coated TiN, ZrN and HfN,” Phys. Scripta 25, 775–779 (1982). 23. W.-C. Chen, Y.-R. Lin, X.-J. Guo, and S.-T. Wu, “Heteroepitaxial TiN of very low mosaic spread on Al2O3,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 42, 208–212 (2003). 24. B. Johansson, J. Sundgren, J. Greene, A. Rockett, and S. Barnett, “Growth and properties of single crystal TiN films deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3, 303–307 (1985). 25. P. Patsalas and S. Logothetidis, “Optical, electronic, and transport properties of nanocrystalline titanium nitride thin films,” J. Appl. Phys. 90, 4725–4734 (2001). 26. N. Fang, H. Lee, C. Sun, and X. Zhang, “Sub-diffraction-limited optical imaging with a silver superlens,” Science 308, 534–537 (2005). 27. Z. Liu, H. Lee, Y. Xiong, C. Sun, and X. Zhang, “Far-field optical hyperlens magnifying sub-diffraction-limited objects,” Science 315, 1686–1686 (2007). 28. D. Schurig, J. Mock, B. Justice, S. Cummer, J. Pendry, A. Starr, and D. Smith, “Metamaterial electromagnetic cloak at microwave frequencies,” Science 314, 977–980 (2006). 29. A. Kildishev and V. Shalaev, “Engineering space for light via transformation optics,” Opt. Lett. 33, 43–45 (2008). 30. P. Johnson and R. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972). 31. G. Naik and A. Boltasseva, “A comparative study of semiconductor-based plasmonic metamaterials,” Metamaterials 5, 1–7 (2011). 32. M. Noginov, L. Gu, J. Livenere, G. Zhu, A. Pradhan, R. Mundle, M. Bahoura, Y. Barnakov, and V. Podolskiy, “Transparent conductive oxides: plasmonic materials for telecom wavelengths,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 021101 (2011). 33. V. Drachev, U. Chettiar, A. Kildishev, H. Yuan, W. Cai, and V. Shalaev, “The Ag dielectric function in plasmonic metamaterials,” Opt. Express 16, 1186–1195 (2008). 34. G. Naik, J. Schroeder, T. Sands, and A. Boltasseva, “Titanium nitride as a plasmonic material for visible wavelengths,” Arxiv preprint arXiv:1011.4896 (2010). 35. E. Narimanov and A. Kildishev, “Optical black hole: broadband omnidirectional light absorber,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 041106 (2009). 36. H. Kim, J. Horwitz, S. Qadri, and D. Chrisey, “Epitaxial growth of Al-doped ZnO thin films grown by pulsed laser deposition,” Thin Solid Films 420, 107–111 (2002). 37. B. Lee, T. Kim, and S. Jeong, “Growth and characterization of single crystalline Ga-doped ZnO films using RF magnetron sputtering,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39, 957–961 (2006). 38. A. Gālca, M. Secu, A. Vlad, and J. Pedarnig, “Optical properties of zinc oxide thin films doped with aluminum and lithium,” Thin Solid Films 518, 4603–4606 (2010). #151151 $15.00 USD Received 15 Jul 2011; revised 29 Aug 2011; accepted 30 Aug 2011; published 6 Sep 2011 (C) 2011 OSA 1 October 2011 / Vol. 1, No. 6 / OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS 1091